The Pier-2 as A Tourist Spot

Today I went to the Pier-2 Art Centre and found that some decorations and facilities chiefly catered for tourists in the spot. For me, the ground of Art Centre in which is located near the place I live used to be a raw place choked by wilderness. Also, the old trains lays on the ground marks the transport in good old days. Subsequently the city government made its ground a neat place, which is very cozy for the mass. There were not many people as having expected this weekend; however, the ground of grass unexpectedly was changed into a sort of yard, a field of filed bright red flowers scattered. The ground is supposed to serve the public for doing exercises like jogging, relaxation and dog-walking. But I don't see why a nice place has to, or must, generate some kind of delicate atmosphere for mainly developing a form of tourist spot, which eagerly attracts the tourists who unavoidably and usually come and go. In addition to the decorations, some of the facilities emerge for those who tread the ground of grass. A red bridge is initially created perhaps for reducing the college students' unsafety in traffic. The wooden sunbeds are produced next, as if they suggested that the tourists have a sort of city style in relaxation not only outside of the city but inside the city. Besides, a square swing with lights shinning in the evening is later built for whoever may last longer in this place. All these facilities implemented obviously show the signs of how people are welcomed to have more sightseeing in Art Centre during their visit of the tour. Furthermore, I saw some of the buses entering into the Art Centre in the afternoon, and I was quite worried if the Art Centre would be provided with some temporary parking lots spared exclusively for the passenger transports. If those gigantic vehicles are allowed to come in the Art Centre at will, then the residents will suffer the problems of gas pollution and their time of being packed with those tourists. Absolutely terrible.